|
How long did it take to write The Perfect Assassin? |
|
|
It took roughly four years. It was my first project of this
sort, and so there were a number of false starts. I’ve read a
few articles about how individual authors organize their
stories and set work schedules—enough to know that each one
seems different. If nothing else, I was persistent. As I work
on my next book, things are coming along much more quickly. |
|
How did you get the idea for the book? |
|
|
I
wouldn’t consider the book a single idea, but rather an
amalgam of thoughts. I’ve drawn parts from personal
experience, and parts from things I’ve read, both fiction and
non-fiction. I’m also a student of current events,
particularly involving world affairs. It gives a great supply
of ammunition to keep a reader involved. |
|
The book is, in places, highly technical and detailed. Are
these details something you’ve learned from your military
experience, or was there special research conducted? |
|
|
A
good question, but again it’s a mix. When I was in the
military, I held a Top Secret security clearance. I know how
that system works. I’ve been out of the military for some time
now, so much of my old information has been eclipsed, and some
probably declassified. But for The Perfect Assassin, it
wasn’t necessary to dig into any of that. An incredible amount
of technical data is available openly in the media, journals
and libraries. The key is this--with a basic understanding of
how things work, both technically and operationally, a good
researcher can take a few scraps of technical data, and
surmise the rest. How a new sensor or vehicle is used, what
its capabilities might be--a magazine like Aviation Week
and Space Technology makes a living out of
connecting these kinds of dots. And having been on the
operational side, I can tell you they’re pretty darned good at
it. That’s how I researched The Perfect Assassin. I
took bits and pieces of information, and tried to mesh them
together in a common sense way. |
|
How were you able
to weave together many different characters and plot lines
while keeping the story nicely paced and fluid? |
|
|
Of
course, you never want too many characters. I tried to make
each distinct enough in manner, position, or location that
there would be no confusion. The plot does have a number of
vectors, but I think as the story draws to a close, they all
manage to coalesce. The first draft was—well, a first draft. I
worked a lot to cut down and simplify until everything seemed
to fall into place. |
|
Are the characters in The Perfect Assassin based on
people you know? |
|
|
No,
not really. Most are a combination of characteristics I’ve
seen in other people. I think a writer has to exaggerate the
traits he wants his characters to exhibit, but still make them
believable and human. For me, as a writer, I think I’d find it
distracting and counterproductive to try to nail down a real
person as a character. |
|
Do any of the characters in The Perfect Assassin have
an autobiographical basis? |
|
|
No.
But Freud might argue otherwise. |
|
You have a keen eye for detail, without providing too much.
When you are writing, do you visualize or map out scenes
beforehand, or do you immediately put them on paper? |
|
|
I
don’t map out scenes or locations. Spatial relationships have
always made sense to me (and a vital thing when flying a
fighter aircraft in a dogfight, by the way). I do reference
maps and photos, and sometimes do “visual reconnaissance” of
the settings I write about. |
|
Do you have any other books on the horizon? |
|
|
Yes.
A lot of people have asked me if the character David Slaton
will return. The answer is no, at least not now. I’m working
on a novel, similar in style, but set in the closing days of
World War II. I’ve always been fascinated by this period in
our history—the final tragedies of a war that truly
encompassed the world, and the dawn of the Cold War. |
|
|
|
|